Professor Paul Francis SFHEA, CoS
Paul is an astrophysicist, who focussed his research on galaxies and black holes in the early universe, before catching a bad case of the teaching bug. Since then, he has focussed on teaching large classes, both in-person and online. He is infamous amongst his students for talking much too fast in an incomprehensible pommie accent, and for his dubious taste in waistcoats.
He has been involved in many educational innovations, including using role-plays to teach astrophysics, developing the ANU's first MOOCs, which have currently been taken by over 300,000 students from 178 countries around the world, and for teaching the large 1st year physics classes without any lectures. He has won a wide range of prizes for education and science communication, including the 2016 Â鶹´«Ã½AV Award for University Teaching.
Q&A
Q: How do you see your role as a Co-Chair of the ANU Educational Fellowship Scheme?
There are many outstanding educators at the ANU, often working in isolation, and whose amazing work is often unknown even to their close colleagues. I would like the ANU Educational Fellowship Scheme (EFS) to play a role in getting these people to share their ideas and help them become better known and rewarded across campus for the incredible things they do.
Q: How does the EFS contribute to teaching and learning at ANU?
At present, the main role of the EFS is to encourage people to get some professional development for their teaching, and to get them to reflect on and talk about their educational practice. The EFS also gives some chances to network and talk about teaching, and an EFS certification is increasingly a useful thing to have for promotion applications, though there is still a long way to go in terms of rewarding teaching excellence.
Q: What motivates and inspires you?
As a university, we are custodians of an incredible body of human wisdom and knowledge, acquired over thousands of years. All too easily, this can become a dry collection of facts and theories to be rote learned and then forgotten. But oh! when we can get some taste of this into the hearts and minds of our students, what a difference it can make!
Q: If you could give one piece of advice to a new teacher, what would it be?
Paul's first law of teaching: No teaching plan ever survives contact with the students. Students almost never behave the way you think they will, and what is going through their mind is very seldom what you think. So it's crucial to spend a lot of time listening to students, reading their work, surveying them, and acting on what you learn. There has to be a feedback loop - you teach something, the students react to it, and you learn how they are thinking, what they do and do not understand, and work to correct the gaps. All too often we just "fire and forget" with our teaching.
Q: Tell us about an approach you've taken in the classroom of which you've been proud.
I'm particularly proud of that I've been able to successfully "flip" the large 1st year physics class: replacing lectures with highly interactive workshops and video tutorials. This is popular with students, and has substantially improved both how much they learn and their attitudes towards studying physics.
Q: If the VC asked you how you would change teaching and learning at the ANU, what would you say?
Two of the biggest challenges in teaching are long-term memory (the ability to remember what you learned more than a few minutes after the end of your final exam), and far transfer (the ability to apply the knowledge and skills you have learned in different contexts). We virtually never assess whether we are achieving either of these, yet if we want ANU graduates to be effective in making the world a better place, both are crucial. I'd tell the VC that as a first step we should systematically measure whether our students can remember what they were taught long after the course finishes, and whether they can apply it in different contexts. Let's say we teach someone to think critically in a history class about (say) the French Revolution. Does that improve their critical response to (say) the latest political news?